Technology and politics
Is Silicon Valley getting too big for its boots?
trading floor, swagger, gait, obstinate, conceited...
"IF YOU'RE an engineer in Silicon Valley, you have no incentive to read The Economist," an unnamed tech entrepreneur tells George Packer in this week's issue of the New Yorker. "It's not brought up at parties, your friends aren't going to talk about it, your employers don't care."
Whatever. Their parties sound lame anyway. Mr Packer might agree; his lengthy piece portrays, with much scepticism, a Silicon Valley that has constructed for itself a glassy political vision far removed from the messy but necessary scraps of city halls, state houses and Congress. It is a place where bland libertarian fantasies about technology replacing (or "disrupting") politics are welcomed, and discussions of marginal income-tax rates left to losers who spend their spare time reading text-heavy weeklies. The public services that are the normal business of government can seem distant to the new plutocrats, too: Mr Packer describes a public school catering to wealthy Valley locals where extravagant fund-raisers compensate for declines in state funding. If there is little room for politics as traditionally conceived in either your worldview or your personal life, then why bother knowing anything about it?
I haven't spent enough time in Silicon Valley to know how close this caricature comes to truth, but Mr Packer is certainly not the only one chucking it about. A new book (reviewed by my colleague here) by Evgeny Morozov, a professional tech-sceptic (and one of Mr Packer's interviewees), derides the "solutionism" of the technology world, which turns insoluble difficulties into discrete problems that may be resolved by the accumulation of enough information and the application of appropriately chosen algorithms. When this "big data" approach starts to crowd out subtler, wiser ways of thinking in fields to which it may not be suited (such as politics), reasons Mr Morozov, we risk forcing ourselves into "digital straitjackets" and undermining the assumptions that make liberal democracy work.
A third attack came from Joel Kotkin, a Los Angeles-based
demographer best known for defending medium-sized towns in unfashionable
parts of America. Writing last week in the Daily Beast, Mr Kotkin ripped into "America's new oligarchs",
lambasting the "shady 1-percenters" for concentrating huge amounts of
wealth in their own hands while failing to provide jobs to Americans
outside their own cosseted creative circles. And now, to pile audacity
on to audacity, Mark Zuckerberg and his billionaire pals are doing real
politics: lavishly funding a new group, FWD.us,
that seeks to further the tech sector's interests by lobbying for an
immigration-reform package that will allow it to recruit cheaper
software engineers from abroad.
FWD.us took some heat a couple of weeks ago for funding TV ads supporting conservative pro-immigration politicians whose views on matters like the Keystone XL pipeline were not to the taste of the group's liberal backers. (Some of them quit in disgust.) Meanwhile, a good old-fashioned lobbying effort continues in Washington; the New York Times reports a push to ease regulatory oversight of the hiring of foreigners and the firing of Americans. Interestingly, Mr Packer takes all this to be a sign that the tech industry may be showing signs of maturity. Rather than airily rise above the fray, or, worse, try to produce a technological fix to a political problem, it, or at least those elements represented by FWD.us and the grizzly political hacks it has hired, has chosen to dive deep into the political mud.
Consumer-facing technology firms do seem to enjoy a peculiarly exalted status among both citizens and politicians (though Apple took a beating over its tax affairs in Congress this week). The action plan for FWD.us written by its president, Joe Green, an old pal of Mr Zuckerberg's, says, "Our voice carries a lot of weight because we are broadly popular with Americans." Many tech executives have become celebrities in their own right, as we saw with the extraordinary public reaction to the death of Steve Jobs. It's difficult to imagine Barack Obama holding a "town hall" with the CEO of an oil or car company. And so it is reasonable to be wary of an industry of rich and powerful men eliding its own interests with that of the country at large, or of claims that techniques appropriate to fix problems in one field can be applied mutatis mutandis in another.
Yet are there really many signs of that happening at national level? Among the biggest political debates this year—gun control, immigration reform, deficit reduction—I see few signs of solutionism at play. That FWD.us has had to sully itself with politics-as-usual suggests, for better or worse, that outside the gilded worlds of Palo Alto and Cupertino, politics is operating pretty much as usual. That seems an odd thing to celebrate. But it might be some consolation to the Valley-bashers.
(Photo credit: AFP)
Whatever. Their parties sound lame anyway. Mr Packer might agree; his lengthy piece portrays, with much scepticism, a Silicon Valley that has constructed for itself a glassy political vision far removed from the messy but necessary scraps of city halls, state houses and Congress. It is a place where bland libertarian fantasies about technology replacing (or "disrupting") politics are welcomed, and discussions of marginal income-tax rates left to losers who spend their spare time reading text-heavy weeklies. The public services that are the normal business of government can seem distant to the new plutocrats, too: Mr Packer describes a public school catering to wealthy Valley locals where extravagant fund-raisers compensate for declines in state funding. If there is little room for politics as traditionally conceived in either your worldview or your personal life, then why bother knowing anything about it?
I haven't spent enough time in Silicon Valley to know how close this caricature comes to truth, but Mr Packer is certainly not the only one chucking it about. A new book (reviewed by my colleague here) by Evgeny Morozov, a professional tech-sceptic (and one of Mr Packer's interviewees), derides the "solutionism" of the technology world, which turns insoluble difficulties into discrete problems that may be resolved by the accumulation of enough information and the application of appropriately chosen algorithms. When this "big data" approach starts to crowd out subtler, wiser ways of thinking in fields to which it may not be suited (such as politics), reasons Mr Morozov, we risk forcing ourselves into "digital straitjackets" and undermining the assumptions that make liberal democracy work.
FWD.us took some heat a couple of weeks ago for funding TV ads supporting conservative pro-immigration politicians whose views on matters like the Keystone XL pipeline were not to the taste of the group's liberal backers. (Some of them quit in disgust.) Meanwhile, a good old-fashioned lobbying effort continues in Washington; the New York Times reports a push to ease regulatory oversight of the hiring of foreigners and the firing of Americans. Interestingly, Mr Packer takes all this to be a sign that the tech industry may be showing signs of maturity. Rather than airily rise above the fray, or, worse, try to produce a technological fix to a political problem, it, or at least those elements represented by FWD.us and the grizzly political hacks it has hired, has chosen to dive deep into the political mud.
Consumer-facing technology firms do seem to enjoy a peculiarly exalted status among both citizens and politicians (though Apple took a beating over its tax affairs in Congress this week). The action plan for FWD.us written by its president, Joe Green, an old pal of Mr Zuckerberg's, says, "Our voice carries a lot of weight because we are broadly popular with Americans." Many tech executives have become celebrities in their own right, as we saw with the extraordinary public reaction to the death of Steve Jobs. It's difficult to imagine Barack Obama holding a "town hall" with the CEO of an oil or car company. And so it is reasonable to be wary of an industry of rich and powerful men eliding its own interests with that of the country at large, or of claims that techniques appropriate to fix problems in one field can be applied mutatis mutandis in another.
Yet are there really many signs of that happening at national level? Among the biggest political debates this year—gun control, immigration reform, deficit reduction—I see few signs of solutionism at play. That FWD.us has had to sully itself with politics-as-usual suggests, for better or worse, that outside the gilded worlds of Palo Alto and Cupertino, politics is operating pretty much as usual. That seems an odd thing to celebrate. But it might be some consolation to the Valley-bashers.
(Photo credit: AFP)
| Google Search Gets Smarter InformationWeek ... of its Chrome browser to version 27, delivering improved speed and the beginnings of a more conversational approach to search. Google software engineer James Simonsen says the updated Chrome loads Web pages 5% faster than the last version. See all stories on this topic » |
| Google tackled by Nick Clegg on tax avoidance at No10 meeting The Guardian Miliband told the Google-hosted conference on Wednesday: "When Google does great things for the world, I applaud you. But when Eric Schmidt says, its current approach to tax is just capitalism, I disagree. And it's a shame Eric Schmidt isn't here to ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google Drive updates Android UI, adds document scanning Computerworld The upgrades, announced today on the Google Drive blog page, also includes a cleaner user interface and Drive files are displayed in a "simple card-style," Google stated. The new interface allows Android users to swipe between files to see larger ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Inside Google's Secret Lab Businessweek Last February, Astro Teller, the director of Google's (GOOG) secretive research lab, Google X, went to seek approval from Chief Executive Officer Larry Page for an unlikely acquisition. Teller was proposing that Google buy Makani Power, a startup that ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google Glass triggers gold rush mentality among developers Hindu Business Line It'll be several months before the average gadget-lover will get their hands on Google Glass but among software developers there's already a gold-rush mood about the potential of the new wearable technology device made by the search giant. So far only ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google Joins Apple Avoiding Taxes With Stateless Income Bloomberg Similar practices by an assortment of companies -- from Google Inc. (GOOG), owner of the world's most popular Internet search engine, to Forest Laboratories Inc. (FRX), the maker of antidepressant drug Lexapro -- are drawing increased scrutiny from ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google introduces cash by email function Hindu Business Line Hundreds of millions of Google users already send photos, documents, videos and event invitations via the company's Gmail service. Now the web search giant is enabling to them to send cash as well. Google announced the new payment feature at its I/O ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google Voice Can Prevent Twitter's New Security System From Locking You Out Forbes In both scenarios — that missing phone or that group Twitter account — the solution is Google Voice. Rather than register your actual cell phone number with Twitter, you register a Google Voice number (Google Voice is free and easy to set up). Google ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Yahoo and Google roll out new features amid internet battle The Australian DESIRABILITY, youth and reinvigorated revenue: it's the mantra at the reborn Yahoo, a corporation that has lacked direction and vitality but is reinventing itself to attract millions of new, mostly youthful followers - fresh fodder for its advertisers ... See all stories on this topic » |
沒有留言:
張貼留言