In European Antitrust Fight, Google Needs to Appease Competitors
By JAMES KANTER and CLAIRE CAIN MILLER
The European Commission said that Google's proposal for addressing antitrust concerns did not go far enough and that the company will need to come up with a better plan.
E.U. Pushes Google for Concessions on Antitrust Laws
By JAMES KANTER and CLAIRE CAIN MILLER
Google could face huge fines linked to the way it runs its online search
business, the bloc’s top antitrust official warned Wednesday.
在過去，要確認離線廣告的效果十分困難，廣告也很難鎖定特定的目標客群。即使大型廣告宣傳之後銷售立即大增，也不代表是因為廣告而帶動了銷售。景氣好的時候，廣告預算通常會增加，因此即使廣告完全沒效，但銷售還是會增加。
搜尋廣告效用被過度誇大
2013-07-17
Web only
作者：經濟學人
在過去，要確認離線廣告的效果十分困難，廣告也很難鎖定特定的目標客群。即使大型廣告宣傳之後銷售立即大增，也不代表是因為廣告而帶動了銷售。景氣好的時候，廣告預算通常會增加，因此即使廣告完全沒效，但銷售還是會增加。
網路廣告似乎解決了上述的問題。其一，網路搜尋廣告可鎖定目標客群，廣告的出現是依照使用者搜尋的關鍵字而決定；其二，由於企業可以追縱網站訪客是否來自它們付錢的搜尋引擎，因此也能確定是否由廣告轉為銷售。
不過，雅虎旗下經濟學家的研究顯示，網路世界也充滿了假相關性。在某些日子裡，使用者會拜訪很多網站、搜尋很多次、買很多東西，而在其他日子裡，活動則會減少許多；廣告和銷售之間的關係看似合理，但也不見得真的有關。
另一項與eBay合作的研究顯示，就算關閉贊助商廣告，搜尋引擎的使用者只會轉換至第一個有提到eBay的有機連結。總體觀之，eBay留住了99.5％的流量；會在搜尋時打入品牌名稱的使用者，本來就想找該品牌的網站，因此就算位置比較下方，效果也和贊助廣告一樣好。
不過，像eBay這樣的公司，不只會為品牌作廣告，還會在數百萬個代表潛在客戶的關鍵字下廣告。因此，研究者也深入追了廣告與銷售之間的關係，結果發現，平均增加10％的廣告支出，營收僅增加0.5％。
進行廣告宣傳之後銷售出現上升，並不表示廣告產生了效果；不過，在網路世界至少已經距離理想目標更近一些。在網路廣告領域，因果關係不再晦澀難明；線上廣告或許有機會利用沉悶的科學，來預測如何減低成本並提升利潤。（黃維德譯）
©The Economist Newspaper Limited 2013
經濟學人英文原文
不過，雅虎旗下經濟學家的研究顯示，網路世界也充滿了假相關性。在某些日子裡，使用者會拜訪很多網站、搜尋很多次、買很多東西，而在其他日子裡，活動則會減少許多；廣告和銷售之間的關係看似合理，但也不見得真的有關。
另一項與eBay合作的研究顯示，就算關閉贊助商廣告，搜尋引擎的使用者只會轉換至第一個有提到eBay的有機連結。總體觀之，eBay留住了99.5％的流量；會在搜尋時打入品牌名稱的使用者，本來就想找該品牌的網站，因此就算位置比較下方，效果也和贊助廣告一樣好。
不過，像eBay這樣的公司，不只會為品牌作廣告，還會在數百萬個代表潛在客戶的關鍵字下廣告。因此，研究者也深入追了廣告與銷售之間的關係，結果發現，平均增加10％的廣告支出，營收僅增加0.5％。
進行廣告宣傳之後銷售出現上升，並不表示廣告產生了效果；不過，在網路世界至少已經距離理想目標更近一些。在網路廣告領域，因果關係不再晦澀難明；線上廣告或許有機會利用沉悶的科學，來預測如何減低成本並提升利潤。（黃維德譯）
©The Economist Newspaper Limited 2013
經濟學人英文原文
Free exchange
Ad scientists
By The Economist
From The Economist
Published: July 17, 2013
From The Economist
Published: July 17, 2013
Jul 13th 2013 |From the print edition
Simple tests can overstate the impact of search-engine advertising.
SEARCH for a term like "tennis balls" using Google, Bing or Yahoo, and two types of link appear. The majority form a long list of "organic" results. Companies pay the search engines nothing for these. But those at the very top and on the right-hand side of the screen are paid links, a form of advertising that accounts for most of the revenue of search engines. These search ads appear to solve a puzzle that has preoccupied advertisers since John Wanamaker, the 19th-century founding father of marketing, reportedly declared: "Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half." But new research shows that the simple measures often used to assess the impact of search ads may be exaggerating their effectiveness.
Establishing cause and effect in offline advertising is hard. Ads are difficult to target: space on billboards and in newspapers is seen by lots of shoppers. Some of these eyeballs are worth spending money on; others, either because they belong to existing customers or to people who never will be, are not. And even when big ad campaigns are followed by strong sales, the intuitive conclusion—that rising sales are the result of good ads—can be misleading. Advertising budgets often rise in good times so that spending and sales grow together, even if the advertisements are useless. The ads and the sales have a common cause—strong demand—but may have no causal link.
Internet advertising seems to offer a solution to both these problems. First, internet search ads are targeted: the links that search engines show are based on a combination of the search term a user has typed in and his browsing history. Second, because firms can track whether visitors to their websites come from search-engine links they have paid for, they can work out whether ads convert into sales.
Not so fast. Spurious correlations are also rife in the online world, as a 2011 paper* by Randall Lewis, Justin Rao and David Reiley, a trio of economists then working for Yahoo, shows. Individuals use the web in a lumpy way. On some days lots of sites are visited and many purchases made; on others usage is lighter. This makes comparisons across time unhelpful. On a high-activity day people will tend to perform a lot of searches (and see lots of ads) as well as make many purchases. The relationship between the ads and the purchases looks causal, but may not be.
To test this problem of "activity bias", the authors recruited volunteers online and split them into two groups. The first group watched a video promoting Yahoo, and the other group watched a political broadcast. The first group used Yahoo around three times more after seeing the ad, giving the impression it was very influential. But the control group—those subjected to a bout of politics but no Yahoo promotion—also used Yahoo a lot more. Both groups happened to be in an active period of internet use. This is why they were recruited in the first place and why they used Yahoo more than in previous periods. Lumpy internet use created a false sense of advertising impact.
The problem of activity bias means that in order to assess the effect of search ads, a proper control group is needed. A 2013 study by Chris Nosko of Chicago University and Steven Tadelis of the University of California, Berkeley, shows how such a test can be designed. Together with Thomas Blake of eBay they examined how important it was for the auction site to buy ads that appear when the term "eBay" is used in a search ("eBay tennis socks", for example). In March 2012 they switched off eBay's brand advertisements on Yahoo and Bing, but kept paying for them on Google as a control.
The finding was striking. When the sponsored ad was turned off, search-engine users simply switched to the first "organic" link that mentioned eBay. Overall, the site retained 99.5% of its traffic. Users who type in a brand-specific search are already trying to navigate to eBay's site. Even if they appear lower down, free search results work just as well as ones that are paid for.
Calling Mr Draper
Firms like eBay don't just pay for adverts when their brand is mentioned, of course. They place ads in response to millions of other words that indicate the presence of a potential customer. So a second test also investigated ads associated with non-branded keywords ("tennis socks", for instance). The researchers tracked spending on ads and the number of "attributed sales" (sales made within 24 hours of clicking on a paid Google link) over time. A simple correlation analysis showed a familiar result: ads and sales tend to rise and fall together. A 10% increase in spending seems to raise revenues by 9%. The ads appear to work.
To check these results the authors split America into 210 geographical segments. A third were picked at random, with all Google advertising switched off. Of the rest, the researchers selected regions where patterns of internet activity closely resembled those where the ads were turned off. This allowed them to isolate sales variations that were caused by ads, rather than lumpy activity. The isolated impact is far smaller: a 10% increase in ad spending raises revenues by just 0.5%. (Results for users who had never previously used eBay were stronger, however, suggesting that firms with lesser-known brands may gain more from ads.)
Bosses should still take Wanamaker's fear seriously: a rise in sales after an ad campaign does not automatically mean that the ads worked. But it also shows how the online world is getting closer to solving the conundrum he posed. Far from being an industry where cause and effect remain murky, online advertising may yet become one area where the dismal science can predict how to get costs down and profits up.
©The Economist Newspaper Limited 2013
Simple tests can overstate the impact of search-engine advertising.
SEARCH for a term like "tennis balls" using Google, Bing or Yahoo, and two types of link appear. The majority form a long list of "organic" results. Companies pay the search engines nothing for these. But those at the very top and on the right-hand side of the screen are paid links, a form of advertising that accounts for most of the revenue of search engines. These search ads appear to solve a puzzle that has preoccupied advertisers since John Wanamaker, the 19th-century founding father of marketing, reportedly declared: "Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half." But new research shows that the simple measures often used to assess the impact of search ads may be exaggerating their effectiveness.
Establishing cause and effect in offline advertising is hard. Ads are difficult to target: space on billboards and in newspapers is seen by lots of shoppers. Some of these eyeballs are worth spending money on; others, either because they belong to existing customers or to people who never will be, are not. And even when big ad campaigns are followed by strong sales, the intuitive conclusion—that rising sales are the result of good ads—can be misleading. Advertising budgets often rise in good times so that spending and sales grow together, even if the advertisements are useless. The ads and the sales have a common cause—strong demand—but may have no causal link.
Internet advertising seems to offer a solution to both these problems. First, internet search ads are targeted: the links that search engines show are based on a combination of the search term a user has typed in and his browsing history. Second, because firms can track whether visitors to their websites come from search-engine links they have paid for, they can work out whether ads convert into sales.
Not so fast. Spurious correlations are also rife in the online world, as a 2011 paper* by Randall Lewis, Justin Rao and David Reiley, a trio of economists then working for Yahoo, shows. Individuals use the web in a lumpy way. On some days lots of sites are visited and many purchases made; on others usage is lighter. This makes comparisons across time unhelpful. On a high-activity day people will tend to perform a lot of searches (and see lots of ads) as well as make many purchases. The relationship between the ads and the purchases looks causal, but may not be.
To test this problem of "activity bias", the authors recruited volunteers online and split them into two groups. The first group watched a video promoting Yahoo, and the other group watched a political broadcast. The first group used Yahoo around three times more after seeing the ad, giving the impression it was very influential. But the control group—those subjected to a bout of politics but no Yahoo promotion—also used Yahoo a lot more. Both groups happened to be in an active period of internet use. This is why they were recruited in the first place and why they used Yahoo more than in previous periods. Lumpy internet use created a false sense of advertising impact.
The problem of activity bias means that in order to assess the effect of search ads, a proper control group is needed. A 2013 study by Chris Nosko of Chicago University and Steven Tadelis of the University of California, Berkeley, shows how such a test can be designed. Together with Thomas Blake of eBay they examined how important it was for the auction site to buy ads that appear when the term "eBay" is used in a search ("eBay tennis socks", for example). In March 2012 they switched off eBay's brand advertisements on Yahoo and Bing, but kept paying for them on Google as a control.
The finding was striking. When the sponsored ad was turned off, search-engine users simply switched to the first "organic" link that mentioned eBay. Overall, the site retained 99.5% of its traffic. Users who type in a brand-specific search are already trying to navigate to eBay's site. Even if they appear lower down, free search results work just as well as ones that are paid for.
Calling Mr Draper
Firms like eBay don't just pay for adverts when their brand is mentioned, of course. They place ads in response to millions of other words that indicate the presence of a potential customer. So a second test also investigated ads associated with non-branded keywords ("tennis socks", for instance). The researchers tracked spending on ads and the number of "attributed sales" (sales made within 24 hours of clicking on a paid Google link) over time. A simple correlation analysis showed a familiar result: ads and sales tend to rise and fall together. A 10% increase in spending seems to raise revenues by 9%. The ads appear to work.
To check these results the authors split America into 210 geographical segments. A third were picked at random, with all Google advertising switched off. Of the rest, the researchers selected regions where patterns of internet activity closely resembled those where the ads were turned off. This allowed them to isolate sales variations that were caused by ads, rather than lumpy activity. The isolated impact is far smaller: a 10% increase in ad spending raises revenues by just 0.5%. (Results for users who had never previously used eBay were stronger, however, suggesting that firms with lesser-known brands may gain more from ads.)
Bosses should still take Wanamaker's fear seriously: a rise in sales after an ad campaign does not automatically mean that the ads worked. But it also shows how the online world is getting closer to solving the conundrum he posed. Far from being an industry where cause and effect remain murky, online advertising may yet become one area where the dismal science can predict how to get costs down and profits up.
©The Economist Newspaper Limited 2013
| Google Maps Updated for Summer Travels With Incident and Traffic Alerts ABC News You're not the only one who's preparing for some summer travels. In the past few weeks, Google has updated its Google Maps apps with new features, including live incident reports on road closures and new ways to find places to eat and visit. The ... See all stories on this topic » |
| In European Antitrust Fight, Google Needs to Appease Competitors New York Times (blog) The European Commission on Wednesday formally said for the first time that Google's proposal for addressing antitrust concerns did not go far enough, and demanded that it come up with more far-reaching remedies or potentially face a fine of up to $5 ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google tests encryption to protect users' Drive files ... CNET (blog) The move could differentiate Google from other Silicon Valley companies that have been the subject of ongoing scrutiny after classified National Security Agency slides revealed the existence of government computer software named PRISM. The utility ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google reclaims No. 1 spot in tech world but its hold may be tenuous Los Angeles Times Its Android software powers more than 900 million smartphones around the world, guaranteeing that Google's products such as maps and email are as popular on mobile as they are on the desktop. And although ads on tiny screens are not as lucrative as ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google Glass Gets Patch To Avoid Hacks Intelligent Enterprise (blog) To wit, Google has patched a vulnerability in its wearable Google Glass devices -- best known for their optical, head-mounted displays with built-in cameras -- that could be exploited via QR codes to hack into and take full control of the devices. See all stories on this topic » |
| Google expands, relocates Washington offices Washington Post Google is dramatically expanding its Washington offices and relocating them to within a couple of blocks of the U.S. Capitol. The tech giant signed a lease for a 55,000-square-foot building at 25 Massachusetts Ave. NW. The building, owned by Republic ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google appears poised to unveil new Nexus tablets USA TODAY SHARECONNECT 36 TWEETCOMMENTEMAILMORE. SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Google appears to be getting ready to introduce the next generation of its Nexus tablets. The unveiling is likely to come at a July 24 event in San Francisco. Google Inc. sent ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google Maps finally back on iPad; app's iPhone version updated Los Angeles Times Google on Wednesday issued an iOS version of Google Maps specifically for use on the iPad. For the last nine months, iPad users who wanted to use Google Maps have been forced to use a version designed for the iPhone. A previous version of Google ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google Wants To Nip This Cheap Italian Alternative To Google Glass In The Bud San Francisco Chronicle In March of this year, a Google trademark lawyer reportedly asked GlassUp to change both the company and the product's name, claiming that consumers might get confused, the company says. That's a possibility, given that when I first read "GlassUp", ... See all stories on this topic » |
| Google Play Has Apps Abusing Master Key Vulnerability InformationWeek "We always advise people to stick to applications that are delivered via Google Play," said Bogdan Botezatu, the senior e-threat analyst at BitDefender who discovered the apps, speaking by phone. "But we just saw applications manifesting this behavior ... See all stories on this topic » |
沒有留言:
張貼留言